Are usually safest distance from the 5G cell System?

· 3 min read
Are usually safest distance from the 5G cell System?

If you've ever walked through a city, you may have seen tiny cell towers for 5G on the poles of street lights. They look like small boxes, but they're actually broadcasting wireless signals from mobile providers to your phone.



These smaller towers are replacing the larger built cell towers. While they're not as noticeable however, they could cause problems for people.
The Federal Communications Commission's Radiation Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds determine the maximum amount of time one can expose to electromagnetic energy generated by wireless devices. The limits of exposure are based upon scientific research which prove that electromagnetic energy can be harmful to human health.

The absorption rate specific (SAR) is an indication of the radiofrequency energy that is taken up by tissues. It's usually 1.6 Watts per kilogram spread over a gram of tissue.

However, because 5g transmits at higher frequencies, it has the potential to cause greater energy intensity on the skin and other directly-exposed body areas. This could lead to a wide range of possible harms, such as an increase in development of skin diseases such as dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.

Because of the potentially severe effects of 5g radiation, PSU has chosen to establish a general, localized limits on power density, which is 4mW/cm2 measured on 1cm2, and never exceeding 30 minutes for all 5G services running at 3000 GHz. This limit for localization is in line with the maximum spatial-average SAR of 1.6 W/kg, averaged over one g of tissue at 6 GHz.
what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower

In the event that you've used mobile phone, then you've probably realized that the safest distance from the tower should be at least 400 meters. This is due to the power of the transmission of the cell tower is significantly increased the farther you are from it.

While it sounds like an ideal idea, the reality is that those living close to towers could be more prone to health issues. For instance, a 2014 study in India found that those who lived within 50m from cell towers suffered significantly more health complaints than those who lived farther distance from them.

But, the study found that people who moved into areas farther away from cell towers noticed their symptoms return to normal within a couple of days. Another study has revealed that exposure to high levels of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can cause cancer, brain tumors as well as other health issues.

This is due to the fact that the RF radiation used in wireless communication, can penetrate the human body's outer layer, called the skin. This is vital to be aware of because the skin serves as a barrier to protect against mechanical injury, infection from pathogenic microorganisms, as well as infiltration of toxic substances. The skin is the biggest organ of the human body and is responsible for maintaining the integrity of other organs.
what is a safe distance from a cell tower  for the Minimum Exposure

The FCC's Minimum Exposition Thresholds are based upon many assumptions that aren't supported by scientific research. They include the incorrect assumption that short-term exposures to RF radiation are safe due to minimal absorption into body (i.e. the heating of tissues).

This also overlooks the greater penetration of ELF elements of modulated radio signals, as well as the effects on the body of short bursts caused by RF pulses. These theories are not compatible with current understanding of the biological consequences of RF radiation, and thus they shouldn't be considered for health protection exposure standards.

Furthermore to  what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower , ICNIRP and FCC are limiting its maximum levels of radiation exposure for local peak SARs, based on the peak speed of spatial absorption (psSAR) that is not a sufficient dosimetric tool to determine the degree of exposure to RF radiation. Particularly the psSAR tool is not accurate when frequencies exceed 6 GHz. Additionally, psSAR hasn't been tested for RF radiation exposed to other environmental agents , such as sunlight. Interactions of RF radiation with other environmental agents could cause synergistic or antagonistic results. This can lead to an increased risk of negative health effects. For example, exposure to RF radiation with sunlight may increase the risk of skin cancer and exacerbate other skin disorders, such as acne.